DGS
Trust

Serious Evaluation Boundary

The public trust layer for teams evaluating DGS as a serious protected system rather than a disposable demo surface.

TrustEvaluation boundary
What a serious evaluation should confirm

A serious evaluation needs more than a demo. It should confirm output boundaries, review standards, workspace controls, billing behavior, legal documents, and an intelligible trust posture.

What DGS should already communicate publicly

DGS should already communicate that it is one protected system with a public identity surface, a protected control surface, documented policies, and an operating standard that supports serious use without overclaiming its boundary.

  • Protected workspace access.
  • Documented review and validation boundary.
  • Public legal and trust register.
  • Documented billing and recovery behavior.
What still belongs in private diligence

Private diligence may still be required for security review, procurement review, legal review, negotiated terms, and any domain-specific reliance question. Public trust documentation is only the first layer.

What this is not

This page is not a substitute for security review, procurement review, or negotiated terms. It is the public trust layer that makes DGS legible enough for a serious evaluation to begin.