DGS outputs may be useful and serious, but they are still decision-support artifacts. They should not be treated as unquestionable truth or used without appropriate review.
The user must review and approve outputs before relying on them. Higher-consequence use requires a stronger review standard and, where appropriate, qualified professional sign-off.
This policy is part of product discipline. A serious engine should reinforce responsible use instead of pretending the output alone removes the need for review.